produra Open workspace

Private beta · source review

Code moves fast.
Take a second look.

Find what needs attention in your code. Upload a project ZIP, inspect the evidence, and bring the review into your editor.

Scan your project Explore a recorded example

By invitation. Bring a project ZIP; no payment setup.

Illustrated workflowRecorded ownership example

A signed-in user can still change someone else’s private note. The missing piece is ownership.

The difference is in the evidence

Less guesswork.
A clear next move.

A warning is only the beginning. Find the affected code, understand the impact, and review the next step.

A real pattern, made visible

“It checks the login.
So it’s safe, right?”

Not always. In this private-notes example, the app knows who you are—but the update doesn’t check whether the note is yours.

Produra identifies the source pattern and records its evidence. Take the review to your editor to inspect the intended ownership rule.

Review your project’s source
private-notesExample report
Ownership · needs review

A private note can be
changed by another user.

The update finds a note by its ID without limiting it to the signed-in owner.

notes/repository.tsSuggested change
  .from("notes")  .update(changes)  .eq("id", noteId)+ .eq("owner_id", this.ownerId)
A change to review in your editor.

This is an illustrative change. The hosted beta does not run application tests.

Based on our controlled Next.js + Supabase example.
What this example demonstrates

This illustrates an earlier controlled local ownership workflow. The hosted beta provides ZIP source review, saved reports and editor instructions; automatic repairs and application tests are unavailable here. A source finding is not proof of exploitability, and earlier passing tests do not establish that your application is secure.

From your first check to your next release

Keep building.
We’ll keep the evidence.

Start your first scan
  1. 01 /

    Bring your project.

    Upload a ZIP containing source and configuration files. Leave out live credentials, dependencies and build output.

  2. 02 /

    Know what needs attention.

    Get the file, the reason it matters, and a next step. Findings and coverage gaps stay clearly labeled.

  3. 03 /

    Bring the review to your editor.

    Review the suggested changes and run your own tests. With scans remaining, upload the changed ZIP to compare source reports.

Same project. Your preferred workflow.

At home in
your editor, too.

Copy a saved review into Codex, Cursor or Claude. The instructions keep findings and source references together; your editor handles any approved changes.

Open your reports
CodexCopy review
CursorCopy review
ClaudeCopy review

Source review. Your editor. Your approval.

The next thing you ship

Make it something
you can stand behind.

Check your project

Private beta. Sign in with your invited account.